114
MPs sign early day motion to preserve National Wildlife Crime Unit
January
2013. Just weeks after a report revealed that the international trade in
illegal wildlife products has reached $19 million per year, and that the trade
strengthens criminal networks, undermines national security, and poses
increasing risks to global health, besides driving many endangered species
towards extinction, the British Government is refusing to commit to providing
funding for the National Wildlife Crime Unit.
Paltry
amount required
The unit employs just 10 people and receives a tiny £136,000 annually from the Home Office and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), but the funding has not yet been agreed. The current funding expires on 31st March and without the funding from DEFRA the unit will almost certainly close.
The unit employs just 10 people and receives a tiny £136,000 annually from the Home Office and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), but the funding has not yet been agreed. The current funding expires on 31st March and without the funding from DEFRA the unit will almost certainly close.
The National
Wildlife Crime Unit was launched in 2006; the NWCU is a multi-agency
police-led unit, set up to target and disrupt serious wildlife crime on a
regional, national and international level.
Lack
of support from Conservatives
Of 114 MPs that signed the early day motion, just 4 were from the Conservative Party, the party whose policy states "The Government believes that we need to protect the environment for future generations, make our economy more environmentally sustainable, and improve our quality of life and well-being. We also believe that much more needs to be done to support the farming industry, protect biodiversity and encourage sustainable food production."
Of 114 MPs that signed the early day motion, just 4 were from the Conservative Party, the party whose policy states "The Government believes that we need to protect the environment for future generations, make our economy more environmentally sustainable, and improve our quality of life and well-being. We also believe that much more needs to be done to support the farming industry, protect biodiversity and encourage sustainable food production."
With
the current levels of wildlife crime reported from around the world, and with
the UK paying an increasing part as a destination for illegal wildlife
products, not to mention domestic wildlife crime, and for the sake of 83 duck
houses so beloved by Tory MPs, what possible reason is there for not funding
this unit?
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment
You only need to enter your comment once! Comments will appear once they have been moderated. This is so as to stop the would-be comedian who has been spamming the comments here with inane and often offensive remarks. You know who you are!